<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Source Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog</link>
	<description>Source provides specialist research on the management consulting market to consultants and their clients</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:27:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doubts and certainties by Liz Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/2012/03/30/doubts-and-certainties/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/?p=599#comment-286</guid>
		<description>This message could not be more timely, Fiona. For three reasons:

1. The &quot;Moneyball&quot; Reason: That scene in the movie, around the table with Billy Beane and the talent scouts, represented the same old (erroneous) thinking. Had Beane not had the foresight to realize that baseball wasn&#039;t a level playing field as far as the possibilities for &quot;poor&quot; clubs like the Oakland As were concerned, then they&#039;d never had achieved that record-breaking run of wins. Or inspired the Red Sox to win the league! When the ground is continually shifting, no company (consultancy or anything else) can afford to get mired in so-called certainties.

Which brings me to:
2. The &quot;Black Swan&quot; Reason: As Nassim Nicholas Taleb points out in this excellent book, a measure of higher intelligence is focusing more on what you don&#039;t know than what you do. Taleb calls this &quot;negative empiricism.&quot; Again, in times of high uncertainty (which, as much as we don&#039;t want to admit it, these are) you can&#039;t look at back at what&#039;s always happened and expect the future to produce the same. &quot;We can get closer to the truth by negative instances, not by verification,&quot; posits Taleb. A book for everyone to read and ponder.

And finally, from academia (don&#039;t groan!):
3. The Knowledge-Telling Reason. The work by Bereiter &amp; Scardamalia on the two different models of how writers&#039; minds work has a bearing here. I often wondered why so many smart business people wrote really poor books. Not that there was anything wrong with their grammar or composition, just with the superficial level of thinking. It&#039;s all down to exactly what you describe with your son: the knowledge-tellers stick with what they know and just regurgitate that. The knowledge-transformers, however, take an approach that&#039;s qualitatively different, involving higher level goal setting and problem-solving.

Doubts are what true thought leaders have - continually. By focusing on what they don&#039;t know and  not becoming seduced by &quot;certainty,&quot; they discover fresh insights and perspectives, leaving everyone else to re-hash old ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This message could not be more timely, Fiona. For three reasons:</p>
<p>1. The &#8220;Moneyball&#8221; Reason: That scene in the movie, around the table with Billy Beane and the talent scouts, represented the same old (erroneous) thinking. Had Beane not had the foresight to realize that baseball wasn&#8217;t a level playing field as far as the possibilities for &#8220;poor&#8221; clubs like the Oakland As were concerned, then they&#8217;d never had achieved that record-breaking run of wins. Or inspired the Red Sox to win the league! When the ground is continually shifting, no company (consultancy or anything else) can afford to get mired in so-called certainties.</p>
<p>Which brings me to:<br />
2. The &#8220;Black Swan&#8221; Reason: As Nassim Nicholas Taleb points out in this excellent book, a measure of higher intelligence is focusing more on what you don&#8217;t know than what you do. Taleb calls this &#8220;negative empiricism.&#8221; Again, in times of high uncertainty (which, as much as we don&#8217;t want to admit it, these are) you can&#8217;t look at back at what&#8217;s always happened and expect the future to produce the same. &#8220;We can get closer to the truth by negative instances, not by verification,&#8221; posits Taleb. A book for everyone to read and ponder.</p>
<p>And finally, from academia (don&#8217;t groan!):<br />
3. The Knowledge-Telling Reason. The work by Bereiter &amp; Scardamalia on the two different models of how writers&#8217; minds work has a bearing here. I often wondered why so many smart business people wrote really poor books. Not that there was anything wrong with their grammar or composition, just with the superficial level of thinking. It&#8217;s all down to exactly what you describe with your son: the knowledge-tellers stick with what they know and just regurgitate that. The knowledge-transformers, however, take an approach that&#8217;s qualitatively different, involving higher level goal setting and problem-solving.</p>
<p>Doubts are what true thought leaders have &#8211; continually. By focusing on what they don&#8217;t know and  not becoming seduced by &#8220;certainty,&#8221; they discover fresh insights and perspectives, leaving everyone else to re-hash old ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Shamrock organisation revisited, but by whom? by David Biggs</title>
		<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/2012/03/26/the-shamrock-organisation-revisited-but-by-whom/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>David Biggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/?p=545#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Hi, I can only agree with Grahame that Fiona is spot on.  Indeed, it has been great for me as my research in temporary working has a lot to do with working as a consultant.  We are working on a paper that supports this as well with commissioned based consultants.  And hopefully over the summer, one of my students wants to interview consultants about this mixture of work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I can only agree with Grahame that Fiona is spot on.  Indeed, it has been great for me as my research in temporary working has a lot to do with working as a consultant.  We are working on a paper that supports this as well with commissioned based consultants.  And hopefully over the summer, one of my students wants to interview consultants about this mixture of work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Shamrock organisation revisited, but by whom? by Grahame Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/2012/03/26/the-shamrock-organisation-revisited-but-by-whom/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Grahame Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/?p=545#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Fiona&#039;s observations are spot on. We are building a business at Change Associates entirely on this premise. All client work is a continuum from high value high touch consulting to low touch low day rate work - giving client access to specialist freelancers through our community and network. The key is theability to create &#039;a great place to be&#039; for these individuals so they get the best of both worlds - flexibility and independence; but at the same time a community and group of colleagues whom they meet face to face a couple times a year and by maximising the impact of social media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fiona&#8217;s observations are spot on. We are building a business at Change Associates entirely on this premise. All client work is a continuum from high value high touch consulting to low touch low day rate work &#8211; giving client access to specialist freelancers through our community and network. The key is theability to create &#8216;a great place to be&#8217; for these individuals so they get the best of both worlds &#8211; flexibility and independence; but at the same time a community and group of colleagues whom they meet face to face a couple times a year and by maximising the impact of social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HR directors’ views on consulting by Scott McArthur</title>
		<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/2012/03/19/hr-directors-views-on-consulting/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott McArthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/?p=578#comment-175</guid>
		<description>This is interesting Fiona and reflects some of my experience if not all. The issue I had when working with the larger HR consultancies was that they focused not on HR service delivery or development, rather they look for and chase the big IT deal. 

The HRD is therefore &quot;rushed&quot; to the IT discussion rather than receiving insight and help with more mainstream HR issues.

The good news is that there are many niche HR firms, (including my own!) really interested in the total HR challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting Fiona and reflects some of my experience if not all. The issue I had when working with the larger HR consultancies was that they focused not on HR service delivery or development, rather they look for and chase the big IT deal. </p>
<p>The HRD is therefore &#8220;rushed&#8221; to the IT discussion rather than receiving insight and help with more mainstream HR issues.</p>
<p>The good news is that there are many niche HR firms, (including my own!) really interested in the total HR challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What do 400+ clients have to say about consultants? by Jason Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/2012/03/14/what-do-400-clients-have-to-say-about-consultants-2/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/?p=558#comment-116</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to hear that most companies are pleased with the level of service provided by their consultants.  Too often you hear the complaints without that input, which is belied by the billions spent on consulting services annually.

Regarding the complaint about listening, I have heard this so many times that I could call it before I read it.  This action directly impacts the ability to form trusted relationships and results in the inability to sell add-on projects.  I recommend the book,&quot;The Trusted Advisor&quot; by Maister, Green and Galford as a good place to begin to learn about how to remedy the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to hear that most companies are pleased with the level of service provided by their consultants.  Too often you hear the complaints without that input, which is belied by the billions spent on consulting services annually.</p>
<p>Regarding the complaint about listening, I have heard this so many times that I could call it before I read it.  This action directly impacts the ability to form trusted relationships and results in the inability to sell add-on projects.  I recommend the book,&#8221;The Trusted Advisor&#8221; by Maister, Green and Galford as a good place to begin to learn about how to remedy the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the whole consulting world wants to compete with McKinsey by Tariq Siraj</title>
		<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/2012/03/01/why-the-whole-consulting-world-wants-to-compete-with-mckinsey/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq Siraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/?p=527#comment-80</guid>
		<description>There was a very funny &#039;fake news&#039; article from last year in The Unreal Times (an Indian version of The Onion) suggesting that BCG were sick of always being seen as number 2 and were bringing in McKinsey to tell them how to over-take McKinsey and be number 1.
In many (maybe most) areas McKinsey are probably better than the competition - but that is actually irrelevant. The prestige, background, alumni and status are what matters above all else.  As the article suggests, saying &#039;we compete with McKinsey&#039; or &#039;we work with McKinsey&#039; is the primary objective of the competition and the clients alike. McKinsey&#039;s brand is more powerful than the actual delivery of their competition.  That&#039;s what you call powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a very funny &#8216;fake news&#8217; article from last year in The Unreal Times (an Indian version of The Onion) suggesting that BCG were sick of always being seen as number 2 and were bringing in McKinsey to tell them how to over-take McKinsey and be number 1.<br />
In many (maybe most) areas McKinsey are probably better than the competition &#8211; but that is actually irrelevant. The prestige, background, alumni and status are what matters above all else.  As the article suggests, saying &#8216;we compete with McKinsey&#8217; or &#8216;we work with McKinsey&#8217; is the primary objective of the competition and the clients alike. McKinsey&#8217;s brand is more powerful than the actual delivery of their competition.  That&#8217;s what you call powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the whole consulting world wants to compete with McKinsey by Bala Gautam</title>
		<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/2012/03/01/why-the-whole-consulting-world-wants-to-compete-with-mckinsey/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Bala Gautam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/?p=527#comment-61</guid>
		<description>&quot;Biggest multinational to small construction companies operating out of dilapidated office blocks in the back streets of Mumbai, all (or at least virtually all) have one thing in common: they use McKinsey&quot; Seems an exaggeration to me.I have seen clients restraining engaging with Mckinsey (owing to their price), India is a different market in itself- It&#039;s very price sensitive and people are not comfortable paying McKinsey - opening the doors for R.Berger &amp; OC&amp;C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Biggest multinational to small construction companies operating out of dilapidated office blocks in the back streets of Mumbai, all (or at least virtually all) have one thing in common: they use McKinsey&#8221; Seems an exaggeration to me.I have seen clients restraining engaging with Mckinsey (owing to their price), India is a different market in itself- It&#8217;s very price sensitive and people are not comfortable paying McKinsey &#8211; opening the doors for R.Berger &amp; OC&amp;C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Telling it like it is by Liz Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/2012/01/28/telling-it-like-it-is/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/?p=475#comment-49</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the irony of thought leadership, isn&#039;t it? When the focus is on the safety of &quot;leadership&quot; (meaning you&#039;re sure people are following you) rather than the courage of possibility thinking.

I&#039;m reminded of that exchange from the movie Apollo 13 in which the NASA director says, &quot;This could be the worst disaster NASA&#039;s ever faced,&quot; to which flight director Gene Kranz replies, &quot;With all due respect, sir, I believe this is gonna be our finest hour.&quot;

Thought leaders need to embody the &quot;finest hour&quot; perspective and have the courage to transform those endless possibilities into reality. Who else will?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the irony of thought leadership, isn&#8217;t it? When the focus is on the safety of &#8220;leadership&#8221; (meaning you&#8217;re sure people are following you) rather than the courage of possibility thinking.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m reminded of that exchange from the movie Apollo 13 in which the NASA director says, &#8220;This could be the worst disaster NASA&#8217;s ever faced,&#8221; to which flight director Gene Kranz replies, &#8220;With all due respect, sir, I believe this is gonna be our finest hour.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thought leaders need to embody the &#8220;finest hour&#8221; perspective and have the courage to transform those endless possibilities into reality. Who else will?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2012: the year the consulting industry fights back? by Jason Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/2012/01/16/2012-the-year-the-consulting-industry-fights-back/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/?p=437#comment-47</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not only consulting firms that are risk averse right now.  Many corporations are holding back investments making things more difficult all around.  

Someone needs to take a risk, and from a consultant&#039;s point of view that means low cost pilots, innovation and just plain selling.  

Getting clients to focus on the top line may not be easy, but consultants are often in the best poisition to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not only consulting firms that are risk averse right now.  Many corporations are holding back investments making things more difficult all around.  </p>
<p>Someone needs to take a risk, and from a consultant&#8217;s point of view that means low cost pilots, innovation and just plain selling.  </p>
<p>Getting clients to focus on the top line may not be easy, but consultants are often in the best poisition to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is there a glass ceiling in the procurement of consulting services? by Procurement of Consultancy &#8211; it&#8217;s the value, not the cost that matters — Spend Matters UK/Europe</title>
		<link>http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/2012/01/09/is-there-a-glass-ceiling-in-the-procurement-of-consulting-services/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Procurement of Consultancy &#8211; it&#8217;s the value, not the cost that matters — Spend Matters UK/Europe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sourceforconsulting.com/blog/?p=431#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] my co-author, has also written on this issue in a recent article – read her take on it here. She suggests that the nature of the consultancy purchase means that procurement will never [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my co-author, has also written on this issue in a recent article – read her take on it here. She suggests that the nature of the consultancy purchase means that procurement will never [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

